General
WEISERT BROS. TOBACCO CO. v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. et al.; LARUS & BRO. CO. v. SAME
163 F. 712·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WEISERT BROS. TOBACCO CO. v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. et al. LARUS & BRO. CO. v. SAME.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
July 10, 1908.)
Harlan F. Stone, for plaintiff.
A. H. Burroughs, for defendants American Tobacco Company and Mac-Andrews & Forbes Company.
Nicoll, Anable, Lindsay & Fuller (De Lancey Nicoll, of counsel), for defendants James B. Duke and Karl Jungbluth.
[MAJORITY — RAY, District Judge.]
RAY, District Judge.
In United States Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco Company et al., 163 Fed. 701, I have stated some of the reasons which lead me to the conclusion that a cause of action is stated in that case. A reading of the complaints in the above cases leads me to the same conclusion therein.
Demurrers overruled, with costs. On payment thereof in 30 days, defendants may answer.