Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
DUBILIER CONDENSER & RADIO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK COIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
16 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DUBILIER CONDENSER & RADIO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK COIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 21, 1927.)
No. 168.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Wm. E. Nickel, of New York City, for appellant..
Joshua R. H. Potts, George B. Parkinson, and Ernest C. Root, all of Chicago, 111. (Emory, Booth, Janney & Varney, of Chicago, 111., of counsel), for appellee.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed in open court, without prejudice to further proceedings after final decree.