Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Harvey N. De Witt, Deceased. Robert H. Clark, as Executor, Appellant; Lillie M. De Witt, Respondent
188 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Harvey N. De Witt, Deceased. Robert H. Clark, as Executor, Appellant; Lillie M. De Witt, Respondent.
(Submitted March 8, 1907;
decided April 2, 1907.)
Matter of De Witt, 113 App. Div. 790, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 8, 1906, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the Orange County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate a paper propounded as the will of Harvey N. De Witt, deceased.
John F. Halstead for appellant.
John A. Kemp for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.