Corporations
G. S. ROGERS, Doing Business as Rex Duplex Fitting Co., et al., Appellants, v. ALEMITE CORP., Appellee
74 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
G. S. ROGERS, Doing Business as Rex Duplex Fitting Co., et al., Appellants, v. ALEMITE CORP., Appellee.
No. 5463.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 18, 1934.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1935.
Charles M. Clarke, Clarke & Doolittle, W. G. Doolittle, and James Roy Van Kirk, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
Lynn A. Williams and Albin C. Ahlberg, both of Chicago, 111., and Frank B. Fox, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In this case, infringement, by the defendants, of certain claims of patent No. 1,307,-734, granted to Gullborg, was charged. On final hearing, the court held the patent valid and infringed.
The mechanism of the patent involved is described at length in Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corporation (C. C. A.) 52 F.(2d) 36, and reference thereto saves needless repetition. The questions involved in the present case were discussed by the court below in its opinion, and, as no new principle of patent law is involved and we find no error in that court’s view, we limit ourselves to affirming the case on the opinion of the trial judge (Alemite Corporation v. Rogers, 5 F. Supp. 940).