General
Adams Laundry Machinery Company, Respondent, v. Joseph H. Prunier, Appellant
142 A.D. 913·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Third Department,
January, 1911.
Adams Laundry Machinery Company, Respondent, v. Joseph H. Prunier, Appellant.
Venue — change of place of trial.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Rensselaer on the 4th day of May, 1910, denying the defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from the county of Rensselaer to the county of Schenectady.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
It is conceded that all the transactions out of which this action arose took place in the county of Schenectady. So far as the motion papers disclose, this fact is supplemented by the residence in the county of Schenectady of all the material witnesses. The place of trial should have been changed to that county. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. All concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide event.