General
Lewis Cuddeback, Appellant, v. Oscar F. Sherman, Respondent, et al.
95 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lewis Cuddeback, Appellant, v. Oscar F. Sherman, Respondent, et al.
(Argued March 5, 1884 ;
decided March 21, 1884.)
The judgment in this action was reversed because of error in the reception and the rejection of evidence. Eo question of any general interest was presented.
W. H. Cuddeback for appellant.
Lewis E. Carr for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per curiam]
Per curiam
mem. for reversal of judgment and granting new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.