Contracts · MBE-tested
SIMPSON, doing business as MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES et al.
369 U.S. 526·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. · Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SIMPSON, doing business as MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.
D. C. Nolan for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.