General
Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
372 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 108. No. 109. No. 110. No. 125.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al. on the motion. Warren Price, Jr. for appellant in No. 109 in support of the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 371 U. S. 808.) The motion of the appellants for an allotment of additional time for oral argument is granted and 30 minutes are allotted for that purpose.