General
Irvine J. Kittinger, Respondent, v. Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Hiram W. Deyo and Another, Respondents
244 A.D. 876·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Irvine J. Kittinger, Respondent, v. Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Hiram W. Deyo and Another, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudieation of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]