Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Abo et al. v. McGrath, Attorney General, et al.; Aoki et al. v. Barber, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization Service; McGrath, Attorney General, et al. v. Abo et al.; and Barber, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization Service, v. Aoki et al.
342 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 112.
No. 113.
No. 121.
No. 122.
Abo et al. v. McGrath, Attorney General, et al.; Aoki et al. v. Barber, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization Service; McGrath, Attorney General, et al. v. Abo et al.; and Barber, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization Service, v. Aoki et al.
Wayne M. Collins for petitioners in Nos. 112 and 113 and respondents in Nos. 121 and 122.
Solicitor General Perl-man for petitioners in Nos.. 121 and 122, and with Mr. Perlman for respondents in Nos. 112 and 113 were Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Samuel D. Slade and Herman Marcuse.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.