Corporations
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners v. MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS, et al.
136 S. Ct. 2159195 L. Ed. 2d 637·Supreme Court of the United States·2016
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners
v.
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS, et al.
No. 13-1496.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 23, 2016.
Neal Kumar Katyal, Colleen E.R. Sinzdak, Eugene A. Sokoloff, Frederick Liu, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, Melissa T. Carleton, Acting Attorney General, N. Cheryl Hamby, Choctaw, MS, C. Bryant Rogers, Carolyn J. Abeita, VanAmberg, Rogers, Yepa, Abeita, Gomez & Works, LLP, Santa Fe, NM, Riyaz A. Kanji, Philip H. Tinker, Kanji & Katzen, PLLC, Detroit, MI, Terry L. Jordan, Attorney At Law, Philadelphia, MS, Brian D. Dover, Attorney PLLC, Jonesboro, AR, for Respondents.
Edward F. Harold, Fisher & Phillips LLP, New Orleans, LA, Thomas C. Goldstein, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Bethesda, MD, for Petitioners.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.