Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Andrew YOUNG v. UNITED STATES of America
67 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew YOUNG v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 5058.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 4, 1933.
Harold J. Bandy, of Granite City, Ill., for appellant.
Paul F. Jones, of Danville, Ill., for the United States.
Before SPARKS and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellee, counsel for appellant consenting thereto, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed ; and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.