Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
James White, Appellant, v. Edward Livingston, Appellant, and Henry J. Brown et al, Respondents, Impleaded with Others
174 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James White, Appellant, v. Edward Livingston, Appellant, and Henry J. Brown et al, Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
White v. Livingston, 69 App. Div. 361, affirmed.
(Argued March 23, 1903;
decided April 9, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 27, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of the respondents herein entered, upon the report of a referee.
Hector M. Hitchings for plaintiff, appellant.
I. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred G. Petté for defendant, appellant.
Frederick P. Bellamy, I. FT. JSiemuright, FramkUn Gouch and Oharles Be Hart Brower for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.