HENRY v. STATE

(77 South. 969) HENRY v. STATE. (6 Div. 338.) (Court of Appeals of Alabama. Feb. 12, 1918.) Criminal Law &wkey;1094 — Absence of Bill of Exceptions. There being no bill of exceptions and no error of reversible nature appearing in the record, judgment of conviction will be affirmed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; Wm. B. Fort, Judge. Shan Henry was convicted of grand larceny and appeals. Affirmed. W. Shan Henry, pro se. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State. [MAJORITY — BRICKEN, J.] BRICKEN, J. The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of grand larceny in the circuit court of Jefferson county, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of ten years. From this judgment of conviction he appeals; the appeal is taken on the record proper without bill of exceptions. The clerk of the court certifies under seal of office that the time for filing the bill of exceptions in this cause has expired, and that no bill of exceptions has been filed in his office. A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any error of a reversible nature. The indictment is in regular form as required by law, and charges grand larceny. It was not subject to demurrer interposed, and the court committed no error in overruling the demurrers. The sentence pronounced was authorized by the statute prescribing the penalty for grand larceny. From the record, it appears that all the proceedings of the lower court were regular, and without error, and therefore, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.