Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roger Walters, Appellant

284 A.D.2d 419726 N.Y.S.2d 294·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Walters, Appellant. [726 NYS2d 294] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Perone, J.), rendered April 8, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Bracken, P. J., Friedmann, Florio, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.