General

Markel Cleaning and Dyeing Works, Incorporated, Appellant, v. William Kleinberg and Harry Ordan, Respondents, and Isadore Rutkin, Defendant

252 A.D. 838·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Markel Cleaning and Dyeing Works, Incorporated, Appellant, v. William Kleinberg and Harry Ordan, Respondents, and Isadore Rutkin, Defendant. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendants in an action on promissory notes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.