Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
John Albert, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent
150 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Albert, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued June 18, 1896;
decided October 13, 1896.)
Albert v. H. T. G. & H. B. B. B. Go., 80 Hun, 152, affirmed.
Appeal from order .of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the -third judicial department, entered October 3, 1894, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granted a new trial.
. J. Newton Fiero for appellant.
Hamilton Harris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order of General Term reversing judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed and, judgment absolute ordered., against the the plaintiff, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.-