Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers et al. v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. et al.
323 U.S. 695·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 337.
International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers et al. v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. et al.
October 16, 1944.
Mr. Louis N. Wolf for petitioners. Messrs. A. C. Wallace, H. W. Blair, John G. Madden, James E. Burke, and Ralph M. Russell for the Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. et al., respondents.
Solicitor General Fahy, Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, and Miss Ruth Weyand filed a memorandum on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, respondent, and Mr. Lee Pressman filed a brief on behalf of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amicus curiae, urging issuance of the writ.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.