Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
In the Matter of the ENTERPRISE BRASS FOUNDRY, a Corporation, Bankrupt
5 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the ENTERPRISE BRASS FOUNDRY, a Corporation, Bankrupt.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 1, 1925.)
No. 4258.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington.
For opinion below, see 293 F. 69.
Thos. P. Revelle, U. S. Atty., and C. T. McKinney, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant. Winter S. Martin and Ray M. War-dall, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Reversed, on authority of In re West Coast Rubber Corporation (C. C. A.) 290 F. 160, affirmed by the Supreme Court under date of April 13, 1925, 45 S. Ct. 386, 69 L. Ed. —. •