Contracts · MBE-tested
James ARBOGAST, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
35 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James ARBOGAST, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 18, 1929.
No. 2917.
William T. George, of Philippi, W. Va., for appellant.
Russell L. Furbee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Fairmont, W. Va. (Arthur Arnold, U. S. Atty., of Piedmont, W. Va., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WADDILL and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and SOPER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After a careful consideration of the record herein, we do not think that any of the assignments of error has sufficient merit to justify discussion. The question in the case was a question of fact, which has been resolved against defendant by the jury. There- was no error in the rulings of the court, and its judgment will accordingly be affirmed.
Affirmed.