General
New Louisville Jockey Club et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Oakdale et al.; and Lennox Land Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Oakdale et al.
231 U.S. 739·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 9.
New Louisville Jockey Club et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Oakdale et al.; and Lennox Land Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Oakdale et al.
No. 10.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Mr. Wm. H. Field and Mr. Bernard Flexner for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. M. Chilton for the defendants in error.
Submitted October 30, 1913.
Decided November 17, 1913.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S. 531; Kelly v. Pittsburgh, 104 U. S. 80; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674.