General
Dean LANFORD, Joe F. Tinsley, and Lester F. Habel, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
300 F. 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dean LANFORD, Joe F. Tinsley, and Lester F. Habel, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 19, 1924.)
No. 2277.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of. South Carolina, at Greenville.
Robert J. Gantt, of Spartanburg, S. C., for plaintiffs in error.
Joseph A. Tolbert, U. S. Atty., of Greenville, S. C.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of defendant in error, cause is docketed and dismissed.