Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joab L. Clift, as Surviving Partner of C. Pardee & Co., Respondent, v. Mary E. Moses et al., Appellants
151 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joab L. Clift, as Surviving Partner of C. Pardee & Co., Respondent, v. Mary E. Moses et al., Appellants.
Olift v. Moses, 75 Hun, 517, affirmed.
(Argued October 26, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 10, 1894, which modified and, as modified, affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Louis Marshall for appellants.
William G. Tracy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur, Andrews, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Haight, JJg not voting, Bartlett, J.; not sitting, Martin and "Vann, JJ.