General
James H. Hooker, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester et al., Respondents
172 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Hooker, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester et al., Respondents.
Hooker v. City of Rochester, 57 App. Div. 530, affirmed.
(Argued November 24, 1902;
decided December 9, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 4, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Eugene Van Voorhis for appellant.
William A. Sutherland for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., G-ray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.