Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
State of TEXAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEW MEXICO and State of Colorado.
134 S. Ct. 1050188 L. Ed. 2d 118·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of TEXAS, plaintiff,
v.
State of NEW MEXICO and State of Colorado.
No. 141, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 27, 2014.
Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint granted. Motion of plaintiff for leave to file a supplemental brief granted. New Mexico allowed 60 days within which to file a motion to dismiss, in the nature of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff allowed 45 days to file a response to the motion. A reply, if any, shall be filed within 15 days after the response is filed.