Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Robbins v. Whitman
1 U.S. 4101 Dall. 410·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1789·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robbins v. Whitman.
Practice on certiorari.
Where a justice’s judgment is affirmed, on certiorari, execution issues out of the court aboyo, without a remittitur.
This cause was removed by certiorari from one of the justices of the peace for Northumberland county ; and after argument, the judgment of the justice was affirmed.
It then became a question, whether execution could issue out of this court upon the judgment so affirmed.
[MAJORITY]
And it was ruled by the Court, that execution might issue at once, without referring the cause again to the justice ; as that would be a circuitous, inconvenient and unreasonable mode of proceeding.