Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Rice, Appellant
197 A.D.2d 894604 N.Y.S.2d 858·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Rice, Appellant.
[604 NYS2d 858]
[MAJORITY]
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record shows that defendant’s waiver of appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Derby, 168 AD2d 969, lv denied 77 NY2d 905). Defendant has raised no categories of appellate claims that survive his waiver (see, People v Callahan, supra, at 280; People v Pierson, 195 AD2d 1073; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.