Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
A. C. MONK & CO., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
57 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
A. C. MONK & CO., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 4742.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 5, 1932.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City, and McDermott, Enright & Carpenter, of Jersey City, N. J. (T. Catesby Jones and James W. Ryan, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J. (Wm. E. Collins, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After full consideration of this ease had in connection with (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 1015, we are of opinion that this case was properly decided and should be affirmed.