Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
August Uihlein et al., Respondents, v. Margaret Matthews, Appellant
183 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
August Uihlein et al., Respondents, v. Margaret Matthews, Appellant.
(Argued December 15, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Uihlein v. Matthews, 93 App, Div. 57, affirmed.y
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme ■ Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 16, 1901, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at an Equity Term and granting a new trial.
George E. Milliman for appellant.
Henry M. Hill and Scott Cummings for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Yann, JJ. Absent: Bartlett, J. Not sitting: Werner, J.