Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Thomas J. BAYNHAM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees
513 F.2d 1232·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas J. BAYNHAM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-3572.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 2, 1975.
Rehearing Denied July 8, 1975.
Stuart R. Wolk, Albert M. Gross, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Wade C. Smith, Jim E. Cowles, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Frank D. McCown, U. S. Atty., Ft. Worth, Tex., amicus curiae.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and GOLDBERG and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
Of the Supreme Court of the United States, (Retired) sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See United States v. Palaz-zo, 5 Cir. 1974, 488 F.2d 942; United States v. Skipwith, 5 Cir. 1973, 482 F.2d 1272; United States v. Miller, 5 Cir. 1973, 480 F.2d 1008; United States v. Moreno, 5 Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 44.