Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lawrence Cohen, an Infant, by Israel H. Cohen, his Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant
170 N.Y. 588·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence Cohen, an Infant, by Israel H. Cohen, his Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Cohen v. Metropolitan Street By. Co., 63 App. Div. 165, affirmed.
(Argued February 26, 1902;
decided March 25, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Apjoellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July. 19, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a- verdict and an order denying a motion tor a new trial.
Theodore JEL. Lord, Charles F. Brown and EEenry A. Robinson for appellant.
Samuel Sturtz and ELenry L. Franklin for respondent. .
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, and ten per cent damages under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion. ■ -
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ.