General
Muhlenbroich v. Heinze, Warden; O'Rourke v. New York; Ex parte Schlette; Jackson v. Heinze, Warden; Barnes v. Maxwell, Warden; Yarborough v. Ohio et al.; Justus v. New Mexico; Antipas v. Overholser, Hospital Superintendent; Phillips v. Taylor, Warden; Raymond v. Randolph et al.; Harrell v. Reid, Jail Superintendent; Furman v. Department of Public Safety of Illinois et al.; Rinkes v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.; Schmitt v. Wisconsin et al.; and Smith v. New Mexico
368 U.S. 981·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 652,
No. 655,
No. 673,
No. 690,
No. 696,
No. 708,
No. 777,
No. 803,
No. 808,
No. 813,
No. 823,
No. 845,
No. 865,
No. 904,
No. 946,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Muhlenbroich v. Heinze, Warden; O’Rourke v. New York; Ex parte Schlette; Jackson v. Heinze, Warden; Barnes v. Maxwell, Warden; Yarborough v. Ohio et al.; Justus v. New Mexico; Antipas v. Overholser, Hospital Superintendent; Phillips v. Taylor, Warden; Raymond v. Randolph et al.; Harrell v. Reid, Jail Superintendent; Furman v. Department of Public Safety of Illinois et al.; Rinkes v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.; Schmitt v. Wisconsin et al.; and Smith v. New Mexico.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.