Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Berthold Levy et al., Respondents, v. Robert J. Dean, as Assignee of Walter Carr & Co., Appellant
158 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Berthold Levy et al., Respondents, v. Robert J. Dean, as Assignee of Walter Carr & Co., Appellant.
(Submitted January 17, 1899;
decided January 31, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively April 3 and March 26, 1895, affirming a, judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Levy v. Carr, 85 Hun, 289, affirmed.
H. Aplington for appellant.
Meyer Auerbach and Henry L. Scheuerman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.