General
Dana Import Co. and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. et al. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 220·United States Customs Court·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 67015.
protests 59/13397, etc. (San Francisco).
Dana Import Co. and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. et al. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Ford, J.]
Opinion by
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727) and Abstract 66159, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves.