General
Sarah Brink, Appellant, v. Albert E. King, as Treasurer of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Respondent
157 A.D. 890·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1913·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah Brink, Appellant, v. Albert E. King, as Treasurer of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, J., not voting.