Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
The Railway Passenger Assurance Company, Appellant, v. Lewis B. Warner et al., Respondents
62 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Railway Passenger Assurance Company, Appellant, v. Lewis B. Warner et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 24, 1875;
decided September 28, 1875.)
The questions presented in this case were as to the rejection of evidence. As a maj ority of the court did not concur in opinion it is not reported.
Henry R. Selden for the appellant.
Geo. F. Danforth for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur; except Churoh, Oh. J., not voting; Andrews, J., not sitting ; Allen and Rapadlo, JJ., concur in result.
Judgment reversed.