General

In the Matter of Mark A. O'Brien, Appellant, v. Josephine Amarosa, Respondent

252 A.D.2d 527675 N.Y.S.2d 290·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Mark A. O’Brien, Appellant, v Josephine Amarosa, Respondent. [675 NYS2d 290] [MAJORITY] —In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), entered July 16, 1997, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mandell, H.E.), entered December 3, 1996, which, inter alia, denied his application for child support. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the court that under the circumstances of this case, there is no basis upon which to conclude that the Hearing Examiner’s order was improper. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.