Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. v. St. Joe Paper Co. et al.
339 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 601.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. v. St. Joe Paper Co. et al.
C. A. 5th Cir.
John W. Davis, Edgar G. Crossman, Edward W. Bourne, Charles Cook Howell and Richard B. Gwathmey for petitioners.
James F. Byrnes, Giles J. Patterson and Donald Russell for the St. Joe Paper Co.; Robert R. Milam, Fred N. Oliver and Willard P. Scott for Lynch et al.; Clifton S. Thomson, Chester Bedell, Robert M. McCulloch and Gerhard R. Gerhard for the Manhattan Company et al.; and John M. Allison for Conn, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.