General
H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc. v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 798·United States Customs Court·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc. v. United States
No. 4487.
Invoice dated Gdynia, Poland, June 5, 1936.
Entered at New York, September 19, 1936.
Entry No. 736523.
(Decided January 9, 1939)
Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Dorothy C. Bennett, special attorney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Brown, Judge:]
Brown, Judge:
Tte issue here on conflicting- evidence is a pure question of fact, no question of law being involved. The question is not easy of solution, but on the whole it is considered that the weight of the evidence leans in favor of the appraiser’s action. The appraised value is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment will issue accordingly.