General
Chan Kam, Appellant, v. Luther C. Steward and H. Edsell
226 U.S. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 374.
Chan Kam, Appellant, v. Luther C. Steward and H. Edsell.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
Motion to affirm submitted November 18, 1912.
Decided December 2, 1912.
Mr. Carroll Cook and Mr. Corry M. Stadden for the appellant.
The Attorney General, The Solicitor General, and' Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
Judgment affirmed on the authority of Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U. S. 460, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.