Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Martha E. Clark, Respondent, v. Frederick K. Clark, Appellant
138 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martha E. Clark, Respondent, v. Frederick K. Clark, Appellant.
(Argued June 5, 1893;
decided June 20, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 17, 1893, which affirmed two orders of the Special Term, one of which denied a motion to vacate certain portions of a judgment by default, and the other denied a motion to resettle the preceding order.
E. Gov/nhryma/n for appellant.
Charles M. Ea/rle for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.