Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
WOOD et al. v. UNITED STATES (two cases)
26 F.2d 912·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1928
.. Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WOOD et al. v. UNITED STATES (two cases).
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 3, 1928.
Nos. 5206, 5207.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; James C. Wilson, Judge.
A. J. Baskin, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellants.
Norman A. Dodge, U. S. Atty., and J. Forrest McCutcheon, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Fort Worth, Tex.
.. Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The orders appealed from (26 F.[2d] 908) are affirmed.