General
In the Matter of Wilbur P. Trammell, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent
240 A.D.2d 90667 N.Y.S.2d 965·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[667 NYS2d 965]
In the Matter of Wilbur P. Trammell, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Fourth Department,
February 4, 1998
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Wilbur P. Trammell, Buffalo, respondent pro se.
Roderick Quebral, Buffalo, for Grievance Comittee of the Eighth Judicial District.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on March 10, 1954. On November 24, 1997, respondent was convicted upon his plea of guilty in the Federal District Court for the Western District of New York of making a false written statement to the United States Government, in violation of 18 USC § 1001. On December 11, 1997, this Court entered an order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e). Respondent appeared and argued that there is no corresponding New York State felony and that his conduct does not constitute a serious crime pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d).
We conclude that making a false written statement to the Government is essentially similar to offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 175.35, a class E felony (see, Matter of Tracy, 218 AD2d 48; Matter of Knoll, 181 AD2d 136). Accordingly, respondent is automatically disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).
Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ., concur.
Final order of disbarment entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).