General
KING CHOO v. UNITED STATES; LAW KING v. UNITED STATES
227 F. 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1915
Before LACOMBE, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KING CHOO v. UNITED STATES. LAW KING v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 13, 1915.)
In Error to the District Court of the United States for th§ Northern District of New York. On motion to enlarge on bail.
Before LACOMBE, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURrAM.]
PER CURrAM.
Application to admit to bail is denied, with, leave to renew upon the presentation of a bill of exceptions or a certified court record, showing what actually took place at the time the judgment of deportation was entered. The proceeding, so far as the papers now before the court are concerned, was most informal; thero Is nothing to show officially what evidence there was.