Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
MORRILL v. WISCONSIN
154 U.S. 62623 L. Ed. 1009·Supreme Court of the United States·1877
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MORRILL v. WISCONSIN.
ERROR TO THE SUTREME COURT OR THE STATE OR WISCONSIN.
No. 685.
Submitted March 14, 1877.
Decided March 19, 1877.
Welton v. Missouri, 91 U. S- 275, followed.
Mr. J. P. C. Gottrill for plaintiff in error.
Mr. I. C. Sloan for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chier Justice Waite]
Mr. Chier Justice Waite
announced the opinion of the court.
The judgment in this case is reversed, upon the authority of Welton v. Missouri, 91 U. S. 275, which has .already been followed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Van Buren v. Downing, decided since this writ of error was taken and not yet reported.
The cause is remanded with instructions to enter a judgment reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court and directing -that court to discharge the'defendant from imprisonment and suffer him to depart without day. Reversed.