Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
George W. White, Respondent, v. Warren H. Jeffers et al., Appellants
158 N.Y. 680·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. White, Respondent, v. Warren H. Jeffers et al., Appellants.
(Submitted January 19, 1899;
decided February 3, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court- in the second judicial department, entered May 2, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court; and an-order denying a motion for- a new trial.
White v. Jeffers, 3 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
M. P. O'Connor for appellants.
Chas. S. Taber for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
■ Judgment and order affirmed, with costs and ten per cent damages, under section 3251, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
All concur.