General
Amasa Spring et al., Appellants, v. John I. Brooks et al., Respondents
116 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Amasa Spring et al., Appellants, v. John I. Brooks et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 24, 1889;
decided November 26, 1889.)
Reported below, 43 Hun, 838.
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 31, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special .Term.
George W. Van Slyck for appellants.
F. A. Paddock for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Follett, Ch. J., in Haynes v. Brooks (ante, p. 487.)
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.