Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Helena Deuble, Respondent, v. The Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of New York, Appellant
172 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Helena Deuble, Respondent, v. The Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of New York, Appellant.
Deuble v. Grand Lodge, A. O, U. W, 66 App. Div 323, affirmed.
(Argued November 24,1902;
decided December 9, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 15,1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a .Trial Term without a jury.
WilUam F. Lynn for appellant.
Forsyth Brothers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.