Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Board of Street Openings and Improvements, Relative to Acquiring Title to Decatur Avenue, etc., in the City of New York; Cornelius B. Schuyler, Appellant; Henry D. Purroy, Respondent
158 N.Y. 721·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Board of Street Openings and Improvements, Relative to Acquiring Title to Decatur Avenue, etc., in the City of New York; Cornelius B. Schuyler, Appellant; Henry D. Purroy, Respondent.
(Submitted March 1, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 25, 1898, affirming an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee.
Matter of Board of Street Opening, 27 App. Div. 265, affirmed.
Jas. C. De La Mare for appellant.
Meyer Butzel and O. Donohue for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.