Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Northern Elevator Company, Limited, Appellant, v. The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent
182 N.Y. 512·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Northern Elevator Company, Limited, Appellant, v. The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued May 29,1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Reported below, 98 App. Div. 635.
Motion to dismiss an appeal,from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 8, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying'a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment of affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous, the exceptions frivolous, and that the record presented no questions of law for review.
James McCormick Mitchell for motion.
J. Henry Metcalf opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.